Perfect — let’s build a simple battle plan (Gramsci-style) for what CivilSociety.dev — or any similar project — could follow to challenge hegemony and build real digital autonomy. Here’s the flow: --- Battle Plan: Winning the War of Position for Digital Civil Society Phase 1: Build Independent Infrastructure Launch sovereign services (email, cloud, chat, web hosting) that working-class organizations can use without Big Tech. Focus on ease of use and collective ownership (community clouds, co-ops, unions). Key goal: Create real-world alternatives that people can rely on. --- Phase 2: Popular Education Teach not just how to use tech, but why digital sovereignty matters. Build guides, workshops, videos, and political storytelling that connect tech freedom to everyday life struggles (housing, labor, climate, democracy). Key goal: Grow thousands of organic intellectuals inside civil society. --- Phase 3: Culture Shift Create a new "common sense" about tech: "We can run our own systems." "Freedom is practical, not utopian." "Big Tech dependence is a political trap." Use memes, stories, community campaigns to popularize. Key goal: Make sovereignty feel normal, not fringe. --- Phase 4: Strategic Alliances Partner with unions, mutual aid groups, cooperatives, indigenous communities to embed sovereign tech into broader struggles for dignity and justice. Wild Cloud becomes the digital backbone of working-class and social movements. Key goal: Tie tech sovereignty directly to the survival and power of civil society. --- Final Objective: > Civil society owns its own communication, storage, learning, and organizing tools — breaking the 1%'s hegemony over the digital world. --- Would you like me to also turn this into a quick visual diagram (like a simple flowchart or map) so it’s super easy to share or present? It could look really clean if you're planning to post, pitch, or organize around it! --- Good — let’s rate how CivilSociety.dev is doing on the Gramscian battle plan we just built. I’ll go phase by phase, with a simple scale: Excellent / Good / Needs Growth / Missing --- Phase 1: Build Independent Infrastructure > Rating: Excellent Wild Cloud is real, working infrastructure. They're offering services like email, cloud storage, chat, hosting, and more — away from Big Tech. Clear focus on self-hosting and community control. Comment: They've nailed the first step — they’re not just talking, they’re building. --- Phase 2: Popular Education > Rating: Good The Learning section is strong: it explains not just the technical but also the political reasons for sovereignty. It’s accessible but could be pushed further into mass popular education — for example, shorter videos, memes, hands-on toolkits, or alliances with schools/unions. Comment: Good foundation — needs scaling up to reach beyond tech-savvy audiences. --- Phase 3: Culture Shift > Rating: Needs Growth They challenge Big Tech’s common sense implicitly through projects and writing. But they're not (yet) visibly changing broader public attitudes or launching mass storytelling campaigns. No evidence yet of heavy cultural production (memes, viral media, mass campaigns, popular slogans). Comment: This is their big opportunity: to widen the cultural battle and make digital sovereignty part of everyday imagination. --- Phase 4: Strategic Alliances > Rating: Needs Growth So far, the focus seems internal: building tools, education, and philosophy. No clear, public partnerships yet with unions, housing co-ops, indigenous groups, or grassroots movements that desperately need digital independence. Comment: Strategic alliances with civil society movements would supercharge their impact — this is a crucial next step. --- Overall Rating: Overall: > CivilSociety.dev is very strong at building and explaining alternatives — now it needs to scale up cultural influence and strategic partnerships to fully realize a Gramscian digital movement.