--- title: Core Principles date: 2025-07-06 weight: 80 --- The Civil Society Technology Foundation operates according to the following core principles that guide all our work, partnerships, and initiatives. ## 1. Sovereignty by Design **Users must own their data and control their computing environment.** Digital systems should be designed with sovereignty as a foundational requirement, not an afterthought. This means: - Data remains under user control by default - Consent must be explicit, informed, and revocable - Infrastructure should be designed for individual or community ownership - Privacy is a fundamental right, not a premium feature ## 2. Tools Before Policy **We build alternatives rather than asking for permission.** While policy reform has its place, we prioritize creating technical solutions that enable autonomy regardless of regulatory environments: - Direct action through tool-building creates immediate paths to freedom - Self-determination cannot wait for legislative or corporate reform - Working alternatives demonstrate what's possible and accelerate change - Technical empowerment reduces reliance on regulatory protection ## 3. Open Source, Always **Software must be libre—free to use, study, modify, and share.** Open source is not simply a development methodology but a foundation for digital freedom: - Source code transparency enables trust verification and community oversight - Freedom to modify ensures tools can adapt to evolving needs - Rights to redistribute create resilience against capture or abandonment - Collective improvement leads to higher quality and security ## 4. Self-Hosting Infrastructure **Individuals and communities should control their own infrastructure.** Centralized hosting creates fundamental risks of capture, surveillance, and dependency: - Local infrastructure ownership provides true digital autonomy - Self-hosting creates resilience against external disruption - Community-scale infrastructure balances efficiency with sovereignty - Infrastructure design should prioritize simplicity, reliability, and maintainability ## 5. AI for the People **Artificial intelligence must be open, efficient, and serve civil society.** As AI becomes increasingly central to digital systems, its governance and accessibility are critical: - AI systems should run on commodity hardware where possible - Models and training data should be publicly available and auditable - Development should be guided by public needs, not commercial imperatives - Benefits should accrue to communities, not just model owners ## 6. Transparent Governance **All governance must be visible, accountable, and auditable.** How we govern ourselves models the world we seek to create: - Decision-making processes should be documented and accessible - Influence should be earned through contribution, not financial control - Community participation in governance should be substantive, not symbolic - Accountability requires both transparency and mechanisms for change ## 7. Healthy Ecosystems Win **Projects succeed through their value to communities, not popularity or funding.** We evaluate success by contribution to civil society, not market metrics: - Genuine utility to real communities outweighs vanity metrics - Sustainability matters more than rapid growth - Complementary projects create more value than competitors - Diversity of approaches strengthens the ecosystem as a whole ## 8. Forkability is Freedom **Divergence is a right. Balkanization is not failure—it is resilience.** The ability to take a different path ensures true independence: - Projects should be designed for potential forking from inception - Architectural choices should facilitate independent operation - Community disagreement should be respected through supported divergence - Diversity of implementations creates antifragility in the ecosystem ## 9. Interoperability via Consent **Standards emerge from alignment, not imposition.** True interoperability respects sovereignty while enabling cooperation: - Protocols should be open, documented, and implementable by anyone - Standards adoption should be voluntary and beneficial - Federation should respect boundary decisions of participants - Gateways between systems should preserve user sovereignty ## 10. Contribution Defines Membership **Participation is earned through action. Identity is contextual and optional.** Communities grow stronger through active contribution: - Value is created through doing, not just affiliating - Multiple forms of contribution should be recognized and valued - Identity verification should be proportional to the context - Privacy and pseudonymity are valid choices in appropriate contexts ## 11. Critical Adoption over Blind Use **Pragmatism means understanding trade-offs.** We advocate informed choice rather than ideological purity: - Users should understand what rights they give up and why - Perfect sovereignty may be balanced against practical needs - Transition paths from closed to open systems are valuable - Transparency about compromises builds trust and education