Update content to focus on the important parts.
This commit is contained in:
142
content/articles/event-management-tools/index.md
Normal file
142
content/articles/event-management-tools/index.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: Open Source Event Management
|
||||
date: 2025-12-27
|
||||
summary: Tools for organizing conferences, meetups, and community gatherings. When your event infrastructure belongs to you, every registration builds community assets rather than paying platform fees.
|
||||
draft: True
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Events are the heartbeat of communities. They transform online connections into real relationships, create shared experiences that strengthen bonds, and provide regular touchpoints that maintain momentum.
|
||||
|
||||
Conferences bring together practitioners and newcomers for knowledge exchange. Meetups provide regular connection points for local communities. Workshops enable skill-sharing and hands-on learning. Gatherings like hackathons and unconferences foster collaboration and innovation.
|
||||
|
||||
But organizing events on commercial platforms comes with costs: Eventbrite takes 3.7% plus $1.79 per ticket. Meetup.com charges organizers $98-198 per month. And beyond the fees, your attendee data—your community's most valuable asset—lives on someone else's servers.
|
||||
|
||||
Open source event management tools offer a different path.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Why This Matters for Communities
|
||||
|
||||
### The Fee Problem
|
||||
|
||||
Consider a community running 10 events per year with 500 attendees each, charging $50 per ticket. Eventbrite would take approximately $25,000+ in fees annually. Self-hosted Pretix on a $20/month server costs $240/year.
|
||||
|
||||
For free events, the savings are even more dramatic—commercial platforms still charge processing fees, while self-hosted tools cost only hosting.
|
||||
|
||||
### Data Ownership
|
||||
|
||||
Your attendee list is your community. On commercial platforms:
|
||||
- They own your attendee data
|
||||
- Export options are often limited
|
||||
- If they change pricing or shut down, you lose your audience
|
||||
- Your community data feeds their marketing systems
|
||||
|
||||
Self-hosted tools mean:
|
||||
- You own your attendee list forever
|
||||
- Full export capabilities at any time
|
||||
- GDPR compliance in your hands, not a third party's
|
||||
- No risk of platform selling or sharing your community data
|
||||
|
||||
### Customization
|
||||
|
||||
Commercial platforms are designed for the average of everyone. Your community has specific needs: custom registration fields, particular workflows, integration with your other tools, branding that matches your identity.
|
||||
|
||||
Open source tools can be modified to fit how your community actually works.
|
||||
|
||||
### Values Alignment
|
||||
|
||||
For communities built on open source principles, using proprietary event platforms creates a contradiction. Your conference about digital freedom shouldn't fund surveillance capitalism.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Real-World Examples
|
||||
|
||||
### CERN and Indico
|
||||
|
||||
CERN developed Indico for their own needs—managing everything from small meetings to massive physics conferences. Now used by 200+ institutions worldwide, with 25,000+ users at CERN alone.
|
||||
|
||||
Other major users include Fermilab, DESY, and United Nations agencies. The tool handles everything from small meetings to conferences with thousands of attendees.
|
||||
|
||||
### Chaos Communication Congress and Pretix
|
||||
|
||||
The Chaos Communication Congress—one of the world's largest hacker conferences with 17,000+ attendees—uses Pretix. So does FOSDEM (10,000+ attendees). Millions of tickets have been sold through the platform.
|
||||
|
||||
Privacy-conscious technical communities trust Pretix because they can verify exactly how it handles their data.
|
||||
|
||||
### FOSSASIA and Eventyay
|
||||
|
||||
FOSSASIA developed Eventyay for their own open source conferences. It's now used for FOSSASIA Summit, OpenTech Summit, and events throughout the global open source community in Asia.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Choosing the Right Tool
|
||||
|
||||
### Indico: The Conference Powerhouse
|
||||
|
||||
Best for academic conferences, research institutions, and organizations needing robust scheduling and abstract management.
|
||||
|
||||
**Strengths**: Battle-tested at massive scale; exceptional conference management (sessions, tracks, abstracts); strong meeting management; room booking integration; mature and well-documented.
|
||||
|
||||
**Used by**: CERN, Fermilab, DESY, UN agencies, major universities.
|
||||
|
||||
**Considerations**: Complex setup (designed for large institutions); ticketing/payment features less developed; steeper learning curve.
|
||||
|
||||
### Pretix: The Ticketing Expert
|
||||
|
||||
Best for events focused on ticketing and registration, especially paid events.
|
||||
|
||||
**Strengths**: Excellent ticketing and payment handling; beautiful, modern UI; powerful plugin system; seating plans and reserved seating; strong check-in app.
|
||||
|
||||
**Used by**: Chaos Communication Congress, FOSDEM, many European tech conferences and cultural events.
|
||||
|
||||
**Considerations**: Less focused on conference program management; no built-in call for papers or speaker management.
|
||||
|
||||
### Eventyay: The All-in-One Option
|
||||
|
||||
Best for open source communities wanting full conference features with modern UX.
|
||||
|
||||
**Strengths**: Full-featured (ticketing + scheduling + speaker management); modern, clean interface; call for papers built-in; supports in-person, virtual, and hybrid events.
|
||||
|
||||
**Used by**: FOSSASIA events, open source conferences globally.
|
||||
|
||||
**Considerations**: Smaller deployment base; fewer payment gateway integrations than Pretix.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Open Source Options
|
||||
|
||||
| Project | Description |
|
||||
|:--------|:------------|
|
||||
| [Indico](https://getindico.io) | Comprehensive event management from CERN. Excellent for conferences with complex scheduling. <br><small>📊 200+ institutions, 25K+ users at CERN alone.</small> <br><small>📦 [GitHub](https://github.com/indico/indico) · MIT</small> |
|
||||
| [Pretix](https://pretix.eu) | Modern ticketing platform with excellent payment handling and check-in tools. <br><small>📊 Millions of tickets sold. Used by CCC, FOSDEM.</small> <br><small>📦 [GitHub](https://github.com/pretix/pretix) · AGPL-3.0</small> |
|
||||
| [Eventyay](https://eventyay.com) | Full-featured event platform with ticketing, scheduling, and speaker management. <br><small>📊 Powers FOSSASIA and open source events worldwide.</small> <br><small>📦 [GitHub](https://github.com/fossasia/open-event-server) · Apache-2.0</small> |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Feature Comparison
|
||||
|
||||
| Feature | Indico | Pretix | Eventyay |
|
||||
|:--------|:-------|:-------|:---------|
|
||||
| Registration | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
||||
| Paid ticketing | Limited | Excellent | Good |
|
||||
| Session management | Excellent | Basic | Good |
|
||||
| Call for papers | Yes | No | Yes |
|
||||
| Speaker management | Yes | No | Yes |
|
||||
| Check-in app | Yes | Excellent | Yes |
|
||||
| Badge printing | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## The Bigger Picture
|
||||
|
||||
Events are where communities come alive. They deserve infrastructure that serves the community rather than extracting from it.
|
||||
|
||||
When your event platform belongs to you:
|
||||
- Every registration builds your community's database, not someone else's
|
||||
- Every dollar saved on fees can fund community programs
|
||||
- Every customization serves your specific needs
|
||||
- Every year of history stays under your control
|
||||
|
||||
The tools exist. They're battle-tested at massive scale. They're free to use and modify.
|
||||
|
||||
Your community's gatherings deserve infrastructure as thoughtful as the events themselves.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user