Replace the conflated `runner` axis with two orthogonal ones: `manager`
(systemd|caddy|path|none) — who supervises/realizes a deployment — and, for
systemd only, a nested `launcher` (python|command|container|compose|node) — how
the process starts. ServiceSpec and JobSpec collapse into one manager-
discriminated DeploymentSpec union (Systemd/Caddy/Path/Remote); the services/
and jobs/ config dirs collapse into one deployments/ dir. The human "kind"
(service|job|tool|static|reference) is fully derived (kind_for), never stored —
the frontend kind is renamed static. behavior is gone.
- core: DeploymentSpec union + LaunchSpec + kind_for; legacy-aware loader
normalizes old runner shapes; CastleConfig.deployments with derived
services/jobs/tools views; registry.Deployment carries manager/launcher/kind.
- cli: service/job/tool as filtered views + a deployment group; --behavior→--kind,
create --runner→--launcher; lifecycle dispatches over config.deployments.
- castle-api: /deployments primary with /services,/jobs as views; summaries
derive kind; PUT/DELETE /config/deployments/{name} (services/jobs aliased).
- app: KindBadge, frontend→static everywhere, pick-a-kind creation wizard,
per-kind config editors.
- docs: single deployments/ layout, manager/launcher, static kind throughout.
Live migration verified byte-identical: regenerated Caddyfile and every unit
ExecStart line unchanged, so nothing restarted. Suites: core 124, cli 25,
castle-api 55; dashboard build + type-check clean.
6.4 KiB
Supabase Apps in Castle
This is a stack — creation-time guidance for writing new database-backed web apps. A stack is a template + conventions, not a runtime requirement.
castle program create --stack supabasescaffolds from it and seeds the program's default dev-verb commands. See @docs/registry.md forcommands:,stack:(optional), and the deploymentmanager(and derivedkind).
How to build tiny, database-backed web apps as castle programs that target a shared Supabase substrate. This is Castle's "a stack whose default is a substrate": the app owns its code (and stays repo-durable), and rents the boring backend — Postgres + auth + storage + RLS — that an app can't reliably reinvent.
The model: one shared substrate, many apps
Unlike the other stacks (which scaffold a self-contained process), a supabase app is code + migrations that deploy against a shared backend:
- The substrate is one castle service (
supabase, thesupabase-substraterepo) running self-hosted Supabase via amanager: systemddeployment with thecomposelauncher. It is shared by every supabase app. Stand it up once (see that repo's README). - Each app is a directory of
migrations/+functions/+public/that deploys onto the substrate. Its rows/blobs live on the substrate; everything else rebuilds from git.
Apps are isolated on the shared instance by table prefix + RLS in the shared
public schema (and Storage buckets), under one identity pool — correct for a
single-operator datalake. Substrate-per-app is deliberately not supported: ~14
containers per app doesn't scale to "lots of small ideas," and a DB-backed app is
a pet either way.
Stack
| Layer | Choice |
|---|---|
| Backend | Self-hosted Supabase (Postgres + PostgREST + GoTrue + Storage + Realtime + Edge Functions) |
| Client | @supabase/supabase-js (from a CDN; no build step required) |
| Migrations | Ordered SQL files, applied by a versioned idempotent runner |
| Functions | Deno edge functions |
| UI | Static HTML/JS in public/, served in place by the gateway |
| Auth | GoTrue + Postgres Row-Level Security |
Project layout
my-app/
├── supabase.app.yaml # substrate wiring + auth policy (public/private/shared)
├── migrations/
│ └── 0001_init.sql # versioned, idempotent, forward-only
├── functions/
│ └── hello/index.ts # deno edge function
├── public/
│ ├── index.html # static UI — talks to the substrate via supabase-js
│ └── config.js # SUPABASE_URL + anon key (public-safe)
└── CLAUDE.md
Registered as a program with build.outputs: [public] plus a manager: caddy
deployment (root: public, derived kind: static), so the
gateway serves public/ in place at /my-app/ — no service, no process.
supabase.app.yaml
name: my-app
substrate: supabase # the shared castle service this app deploys against
auth: public # public | private | shared: [handles]
table_prefix: my_app_
Migrations
migrations/*.sql are numbered, forward-only, and idempotent. castle program build my-app runs the versioned migration runner: it ensures a
public.schema_migrations table, reads applied versions, and applies only the
unapplied files (in filename order), each in a single transaction with its
version-insert — so a failed migration records nothing and the next build retries
it. Never edit an applied migration; add a new numbered file.
-- migrations/0001_init.sql
create table if not exists public.my_app_entries (
id bigint generated always as identity primary key,
message text not null,
created_at timestamptz not null default now()
);
alter table public.my_app_entries enable row level security;
create policy "my_app_read" on public.my_app_entries for select using (true);
create policy "my_app_write" on public.my_app_entries for insert with check (true);
The runner connects via SUPABASE_DB_URL, or builds one from the generated
SUPABASE_POSTGRES_PASSWORD secret against localhost:5432. psql must be on
PATH; a missing URL or client fails loud with guidance.
Auth, RLS & the three privacy layers
auth: in supabase.app.yaml declares the policy. RLS protects rows, but it is
not sufficient on its own — a leaked URL to a private app would still serve the
static shell and any known Storage URL. So a non-public app must enforce privacy at
three layers:
- Rows — RLS locks rows to
auth.uid()(owner) or a shared allowlist. - Static shell — an auth check gates serving
public/(unauthenticated requests get login/denied, never the app). - Storage — served via short-lived signed URLs, never long-lived public object URLs.
A public app intentionally skips shell/Storage gating (anon read/write, still
row-gated).
Edge functions
functions/<name>/index.ts are deno functions deployed to the substrate's
edge-runtime. Privileged work (anything needing the service_role key) happens
here, server-side — never browser-direct. The app frontend calls the function;
the function holds credentials and can meter usage.
Gateway & secure context
A supabase app is a static deployment (manager: caddy; its public/ is served
in place), so the gateway serves it at its own subdomain
<name>.<gateway.domain>. With
gateway.tls: acme that subdomain is HTTPS — a secure context, which apps
using auth or WebCrypto require — with no private CA to install. (The substrate
service itself is likewise at supabase.<gateway.domain>.) See
@docs/dns-and-tls.md.
Commands
castle program create my-app --stack supabase --description "..." # scaffold + register
castle program build my-app # apply unapplied migrations to the substrate
castle program test my-app # deno test over functions/ (if deno present)
castle deploy && castle gateway reload # serve the static UI at /my-app/
Scaffolding
castle program create --stack supabase generates the full layout above and
registers the program as a static frontend. Set the anon key in public/config.js
(cat ~/.castle/secrets/SUPABASE_ANON_KEY), edit your migrations, and build.
See @docs/registry.md for the compose launcher, the substrate deployment definition,
and the full registry reference. The substrate itself lives in the
supabase-substrate repo (vendored, pinned self-hosted Supabase).