Files
wild-pc/docs/design.md
2026-02-23 01:49:24 -08:00

473 lines
18 KiB
Markdown

# Castle Design
Castle is a personal software platform. It manages independent services,
tools, and frontends on a Linux machine using standard Unix primitives —
systemd for process supervision, Caddy for HTTP routing, the filesystem
for storage, and env vars for configuration. The `castle` CLI and API
provide a registry and coordination layer on top.
The long-term goal: multiple Castle nodes (machines) that discover each
other and coordinate, forming a personal infrastructure mesh. Each node
is self-sufficient. The mesh is optional.
## Principles
1. **Unix-native.** Use the OS. systemd, journald, filesystem, signals,
env vars, DNS. Don't reimplement what Linux already provides.
2. **Independence.** Components never depend on Castle. They accept
standard configuration (ports, data dirs, URLs) via env vars. A
Castle service is just a well-behaved Unix daemon that happens to
be registered in a manifest.
3. **Section is category.** Components, services, and jobs live in
separate sections of `castle.yaml`. The section determines the
category — no role derivation needed.
4. **Language-agnostic above the build line.** Below the build line,
every language is different (uv, pnpm, cargo, go). Above it,
everything is just processes, ports, files, and signals. Castle
operates above the line.
5. **Separate source from runtime.** The repo is for development. The
runtime lives in standard Unix locations (`~/.castle/`, `/data/castle/`,
systemd units). Nothing running should point into the source tree.
6. **AI-manageable.** The CLI and API exist so that AI assistants can
discover, create, and manage components programmatically. Humans
use the dashboard. Agents use the CLI and API.
7. **Simple until proven otherwise.** Filesystem over databases. HTTP
over custom protocols. Shell commands over plugin systems. Add
complexity only when the simple thing actually fails.
## Architecture Layers
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Coordination │
│ Node discovery, global registry, messaging │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Registry │
│ Component spec, node config, CLI, API │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Runtime │
│ systemd, Caddy, filesystem, journald │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Build │
│ uv, pnpm, cargo, go build, etc. │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
The critical boundary is between Build and Runtime. Below it, each
language has its own toolchain. Above it, everything is uniform — a
process that reads env vars, listens on a port, logs to stdout, and
responds to SIGTERM.
### Build Layer
Transforms source code into runnable artifacts. Castle does not abstract
over language toolchains — it just records the build commands and their
outputs.
| Language | Toolchain | Artifact |
|----------|-----------|----------|
| Python | uv | Entry point in venv |
| Node/TS | pnpm | Static bundle (frontends) or node script |
| Rust | cargo | Binary |
| Go | go build | Binary |
Castle's `build` spec is intentionally minimal: a list of shell commands
and a list of output paths. This works for any language without Castle
needing to understand the toolchain.
For interpreted languages (Python, Node), Castle also needs to know the
runtime wrapper — how to invoke the artifact. This is what the `run`
spec's runner variants handle:
- `python` — Python (sync via uv, deploy resolves installed binary)
- `node` — Node.js (sync via pnpm/npm)
- `command` — Direct execution (compiled binaries, shell scripts)
- `container` — Docker/Podman
- `remote` — External service (no local process)
Compiled languages (Rust, Go) use `command` — once built, they're just
binaries. No Castle-specific runner needed.
### Runtime Layer
Manages running processes using standard Linux infrastructure.
**systemd** handles process supervision:
- Start/stop/restart services
- Restart-on-failure policies (OTP's "let it crash")
- Dependency ordering via `After=` / `Wants=`
- Scheduled execution via `.timer` units
- Logging via journald (stdout/stderr capture)
**Caddy** handles HTTP routing:
- Reverse proxy on port 9000
- Path-based routing to services (`/api` → port 9020)
- Static file serving for frontends
- TLS termination
**Filesystem** handles storage:
- Service data: `/data/castle/<name>/`
- Secrets: `~/.castle/secrets/`
- Generated config: `~/.castle/generated/`
Castle generates systemd unit files and Caddyfile entries from the
registry. It doesn't run a daemon itself — it configures OS-level
infrastructure and gets out of the way.
Critically, the runtime layer references only standard paths — never
the source tree. Systemd units point to installed binaries (on PATH
or in `~/.castle/bin/`), not to repo subdirectories. Caddy serves
from `~/.castle/static/`, not from build output directories in the repo.
### Registry Layer
The registry is the central concept in Castle. It tracks what components
exist, what they can do, and how they're configured. But it's not a
single thing — it's three distinct concepts:
**1. Component spec** — what a component *is*. Description, capabilities,
build instructions, default configuration. This is source-level
information, version-controlled in the repo. It answers: "what components
could exist?"
**2. Node config** — what's *deployed on this machine*, with what concrete
ports, data paths, and env vars. This is per-machine. Two Castle nodes
might run different subsets of components with different parameters. It
answers: "what's running here, and how?"
**3. Runtime state** — what's *actually happening*. PIDs, health, uptime,
logs. This is ephemeral, owned by systemd and queried on demand. It
answers: "is it working?"
#### Source vs. runtime split
These map to two files:
**`castle.yaml`** (in the repo, version-controlled) — Three sections:
```yaml
components:
central-context:
description: Content storage API
source: components/central-context
services:
central-context:
component: central-context
run:
runner: python
tool: central-context
expose:
http:
internal: { port: 9001 }
health_path: /health
proxy:
caddy:
path_prefix: /central-context
manage:
systemd: {}
jobs:
backup-collect:
component: backup-collect
run:
runner: command
argv: [backup-collect]
schedule: "0 2 * * *"
manage:
systemd: {}
```
Components define *what software exists* (identity, source, install, tools).
Services define *how daemons run* (run config, expose, proxy, systemd).
Jobs define *how scheduled tasks run* (run config, cron schedule, systemd).
Services and jobs can reference a component via `component:` for description
fallthrough and source code linking. They can also exist independently
(e.g., `castle-gateway` runs Caddy — not our software).
Convention-based env vars (`<PREFIX>_PORT`, `<PREFIX>_DATA_DIR`) are
generated automatically during deploy. Only non-convention values need
`defaults.env`.
**`~/.castle/registry.yaml`** (per-node, not in the repo) — Node config:
```yaml
node:
hostname: tower
castle_root: /data/repos/castle
gateway_port: 9000
deployed:
central-context:
runner: python
run_cmd: [/home/user/.local/bin/central-context]
env:
CENTRAL_CONTEXT_DATA_DIR: /data/castle/central-context
CENTRAL_CONTEXT_PORT: "9001"
category: service
port: 9001
health_path: /health
proxy_path: /central-context
managed: true
```
The node config says what's deployed *here* and with what concrete
values. `castle deploy` reads the spec from the repo, generates
convention-based env vars, resolves secrets, resolves binary paths,
and writes the registry. Systemd units and Caddyfile are then generated
from the registry — never from the spec directly.
This separation means:
- The repo is just a repo. `git pull` doesn't affect running services.
- Multi-node works: sync the spec + deploy on each node, no repo needed.
- The spec is portable and version-controlled. The node config is local.
- AI agents read the node registry to know what's deployed and running.
#### Interfaces
Three interfaces expose the registry:
- **CLI** (`castle`) — For AI agents and terminal users. Structured
output via `--json`. Commands for listing, inspecting, creating,
and managing components.
- **API** (`castle-api`) — For programmatic access over HTTP. Used by
the dashboard, other nodes, and remote agents.
- **Dashboard** (`castle-app`) — For human discoverability. Visual
overview of what's running, health status, logs.
### Coordination Layer
*Partially built. This section describes the target architecture.*
Coordination handles discovery and communication — both between
components on a single node and across multiple Castle nodes.
**Intra-node coordination** (current):
- Components find each other through the gateway (path-based routing)
or direct port access via env vars.
- The registry (CLI/API) provides discoverability.
- No service mesh or message broker required for basic operation.
**Inter-node coordination** (future):
- Each Castle node runs the API, which exposes its component registry.
- Nodes discover each other via MQTT retained messages or mDNS/DNS-SD
(Avahi) for LAN environments.
- The gateway on each node can proxy to services on other nodes,
preserving path-based routing. Components don't know which node
they're talking to.
- MQTT provides pub/sub messaging for events, status, and coordination
across nodes.
**Why MQTT over custom gossip:**
- Standard protocol, every language has a client library.
- Retained messages give new nodes an immediate view of the network.
- Topic-based routing maps naturally to `castle/{node}/{component}`.
- Works across networks (not just LAN like mDNS).
- Mosquitto is a single binary, simple to run as a Castle component.
**Why mDNS/DNS-SD as a complement:**
- Zero-config LAN discovery via Avahi (already on most Linux systems).
- Each node advertises `_castle._tcp` — standard tooling works
(`avahi-browse`).
- Good for bootstrapping: find the MQTT broker without hardcoding
its address.
## Component Contract
Every Castle component, regardless of language, must satisfy a minimal
contract. This is what makes the system uniform above the build line.
### Services (long-running daemons)
| Requirement | Mechanism |
|-------------|-----------|
| Accept configuration | Env vars (prefixed by service name) |
| Declare its port | Env var, registered in `expose.http.internal.port` |
| Health endpoint | `GET /health` returns 200 |
| Data storage | Read `*_DATA_DIR` env var, write there |
| Logging | stdout for output, stderr for errors |
| Graceful shutdown | Handle SIGTERM, exit cleanly |
| Secrets | Read from env vars (Castle resolves `${secret:NAME}`) |
| No Castle dependency | Must run standalone with just env vars set |
### Tools (CLI utilities)
| Requirement | Mechanism |
|-------------|-----------|
| Input | File argument or stdin |
| Output | stdout (pipeable) |
| Errors/status | stderr |
| Exit codes | 0 success, non-zero failure |
| No interactive prompts | Scriptable by default |
### Jobs (scheduled tasks)
Same contract as tools, plus:
| Requirement | Mechanism |
|-------------|-----------|
| Idempotent | Safe to re-run or run concurrently |
| Short-lived | Exit when done (oneshot systemd unit) |
## Component Lifecycle
The path from source to managed process:
```
source → [build] → artifact → [install] → available → [deploy] → managed
```
Each step is distinct:
1. **Build** — Language-specific. Produces an artifact (binary, venv
entry point, static bundle). Castle records the commands but doesn't
execute them implicitly.
2. **Install** — Makes the artifact available on the system. For tools:
`uv tool install` or compiled binary placed in `~/.castle/bin/`. For
services: same — the binary or entry point is on PATH or in a known
location. For frontends: built assets copied to `~/.castle/static/`.
3. **Deploy** — Materializes the runtime configuration. Reads the
component spec, merges with node config, generates systemd units
and Caddyfile entries that reference *installed* artifacts — never
the source tree. Enables and starts services.
For compiled languages (Rust, Go), build produces a standalone binary
and install is just placing it in `~/.castle/bin/`. For interpreted
languages (Python, Node), the runtime wrapper (uv, node) handles
finding the installed artifact.
## Runtime Filesystem Layout
What already exists and what the target looks like:
```
~/.castle/ ← Castle runtime home
├── registry.yaml ← Node config (what's deployed here)
├── generated/ ← Generated Caddyfile
│ └── Caddyfile
├── secrets/ ← Secret files (NAME → value)
│ └── PROTONMAIL_API_KEY
├── bin/ ← Compiled binaries, shims
│ └── my-go-tool
└── static/ ← Built frontend assets
└── castle-app/
└── dist/
/data/castle/ ← Persistent service data
└── <name>/
~/.config/systemd/user/ ← Systemd units (standard location)
├── castle-central-context.service
├── castle-protonmail.service
├── castle-protonmail.timer
└── ...
```
Source (the repo) is referenced only during build and install. Everything
the runtime touches lives in `~/.castle/`, `/data/castle/`, or standard
systemd paths.
## OTP as Design Guide
Castle's architecture parallels Erlang/OTP, mapped onto Unix:
| OTP Concept | Castle Equivalent |
|-------------|------------------|
| Application | Component (independent, self-contained) |
| Application resource file | Component spec in `castle.yaml` |
| Release config (sys.config) | Node config in `~/.castle/registry.yaml` |
| Release assembly | `castle deploy` (spec + node config → runtime) |
| Supervisor | systemd (restart policies, ordering) |
| Process | Running service/worker/job |
| Application env | Env vars |
| Node | A machine running Castle |
| epmd | mDNS / MQTT discovery |
| Distribution | Inter-node coordination via MQTT + gateway proxying |
| "Let it crash" | `restart: on-failure` in systemd |
| Global registry | Merged node registries via MQTT retained messages |
The mapping is conceptual, not literal. Castle doesn't implement OTP
semantics — it uses OTP's *thinking* to guide which Unix primitives
to compose and how.
Key OTP ideas that apply:
- **Isolation.** Components don't share state. Communication is
through explicit interfaces (HTTP, MQTT, filesystem paths).
- **Let it crash.** Services don't need elaborate error recovery.
systemd restarts them. Design for restartability, not immortality.
- **Supervision hierarchy.** systemd's dependency ordering provides
this. Services declare what they need to start after.
- **Location transparency.** Components talk to paths (`/api`,
`/central-context`), not to specific hosts or ports. The gateway
can remap these across nodes.
- **Spec vs. config.** In OTP, an application defines its structure
(the `.app` file) and a release provides the deployment config
(`sys.config`). Castle mirrors this: the component spec defines
structure, the node config provides deployment values.
## Current State
What exists today:
- **CLI** — `castle` command, installed via `uv tool install --editable cli/`
- **Three packages** — `castle-core` (models, config, generators),
`castle-cli` (commands), `castle-api` (HTTP API)
- **Source/runtime split** — `castle.yaml` (spec) → `castle deploy`
`~/.castle/registry.yaml` (node config). Systemd units and Caddyfile
generated from registry with fully resolved paths. No repo references
in runtime artifacts.
- **Convention-based env generation** — `castle deploy` auto-generates
`<PREFIX>_DATA_DIR=/data/castle/<name>` and `<PREFIX>_PORT` from
the manifest. Only non-convention values need `defaults.env`.
- **Gateway** — Caddy on port 9000, Caddyfile generated from registry
- **API** — `castle-api` on port 9020, reads from registry (optional
castle.yaml fallback for non-deployed components)
- **Dashboard** — `castle-app` React/Vite frontend, static assets
served from `~/.castle/static/castle-app/`
- **Services** — central-context (content storage), notification-bridge
(desktop notification forwarder)
- **Jobs** — protonmail (email sync every 5 min), backup-collect (nightly),
backup-data (nightly restic backup)
- **Tools** — ~15 CLI utilities (pdf2md, docx2md, search, gpt, etc.)
- **Manifest** — `castle.yaml` with typed Pydantic models
What doesn't exist yet:
- **Multi-language support** — Rust and Go components (the abstractions
support them via `command` runner, but no examples exist yet)
- **Inter-node coordination** — MQTT broker, node discovery, cross-node
routing
- **Build automation** — Castle records build specs but doesn't
orchestrate builds (each project builds independently)
## Technology Map
| Concern | Technology | Status |
|---------|-----------|--------|
| Process supervision | systemd (user units) | Active |
| HTTP routing | Caddy (port 9000) | Active |
| Component specs | castle.yaml + Pydantic models | Active |
| Node config | `~/.castle/registry.yaml` | Active |
| CLI | castle (Python, uv) | Active |
| API | castle-api (FastAPI) | Active |
| Dashboard | castle-app (React, Vite, shadcn/ui) | Active |
| Python packaging | uv | Active |
| Node packaging | pnpm | Active |
| Linting | ruff (Python), ESLint (TS) | Active |
| Type checking | pyright (Python), tsc (TS) | Active |
| Testing | pytest (Python), Vitest (TS) | Active |
| Secrets | `~/.castle/secrets/` file-based | Active |
| Data storage | Filesystem (`/data/castle/`) | Active |
| Messaging | MQTT (Mosquitto) | Planned |
| Node discovery | mDNS/Avahi + MQTT | Planned |
| Rust packaging | cargo | Planned |
| Go packaging | go build | Planned |